On 1/8/21 5:47 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23 2020 at 6:26am -0500,
> Jeffle Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> ->poll_fn is introduced in commit ea435e1b9392 ("block: add a poll_fn
>> callback to struct request_queue") for supporting non-mq queues such as
>> nvme multipath, but removed in commit 529262d56dbe ("block: remove
>> ->poll_fn").
>>
>> To add support of IO polling for non-mq device, this method need to be
>> back. Since commit c62b37d96b6e ("block: move ->make_request_fn to
>> struct block_device_operations") has moved all callbacks into struct
>> block_device_operations in gendisk, we also add the new method named
>> ->iopoll in block_device_operations.
>
> Please update patch subject and header to:
>
> block: add iopoll method to support bio-based IO polling
>
> ->poll_fn was introduced in commit ea435e1b9392 ("block: add a poll_fn
> callback to struct request_queue") to support bio-based queues such as
> nvme multipath, but was later removed in commit 529262d56dbe ("block:
> remove ->poll_fn").
>
> Given commit c62b37d96b6e ("block: move ->make_request_fn to struct
> block_device_operations") restore the possibility of bio-based IO
> polling support by adding an ->iopoll method to gendisk->fops.
> Elevate bulk of blk_mq_poll() implementation to blk_poll() and reduce
> blk_mq_poll() to blk-mq specific code that is called from blk_poll().
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> block/blk-core.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> block/blk-mq.c | 70 +++++--------------------------------
>> include/linux/blk-mq.h | 3 ++
>> include/linux/blkdev.h | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>> index 96e5fcd7f071..2f5c51ce32e3 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>> @@ -1131,6 +1131,85 @@ blk_qc_t submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(submit_bio);
>>
>> +static bool blk_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie)
>> +{
>> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
>> +
>> + /* TODO: bio-based device doesn't support hybrid poll. */
>> + if (!queue_is_mq(q))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)];
>> + if (blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, hctx, cookie))
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + hctx->poll_considered++;
>> + return false;
>> +}
>
> I don't see where you ever backfill bio-based hybrid support (in
> the following patches in this series, so it is lingering TODO).
Yes the hybrid polling is not implemented and thus bypassed for
bio-based device currently.
>
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * blk_poll - poll for IO completions
>> + * @q: the queue
>> + * @cookie: cookie passed back at IO submission time
>> + * @spin: whether to spin for completions
>> + *
>> + * Description:
>> + * Poll for completions on the passed in queue. Returns number of
>> + * completed entries found. If @spin is true, then blk_poll will continue
>> + * looping until at least one completion is found, unless the task is
>> + * otherwise marked running (or we need to reschedule).
>> + */
>> +int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin)
>> +{
>> + long state;
>> +
>> + if (!blk_qc_t_valid(cookie) ||
>> + !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &q->queue_flags))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (current->plug)
>> + blk_flush_plug_list(current->plug, false);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset
>> + * the state. Like for the other success return cases, the
>> + * caller is responsible for checking if the IO completed. If
>> + * the IO isn't complete, we'll get called again and will go
>> + * straight to the busy poll loop. If specified not to spin,
>> + * we also should not sleep.
>> + */
>> + if (spin && blk_poll_hybrid(q, cookie))
>> + return 1;
>> +
>> + state = current->state;
>> + do {
>> + int ret;
>> + struct gendisk *disk = queue_to_disk(q);
>> +
>> + if (disk->fops->iopoll)
>> + ret = disk->fops->iopoll(q, cookie);
>> + else
>> + ret = blk_mq_poll(q, cookie);
The original code is indeed buggy. For bio-based device, ->iopoll() may
not be implemented while QUEUE_FLAG_POLL flag is still set, in which
case blk_mq_poll() will be called for this bio-based device.
>
> Really don't like that blk-mq is needlessly getting gendisk and checking
> disk->fops->iopoll.
>
> This is just to give an idea, whitespace damaged due to coding in mail
> client, but why not remove above blk_poll_hybrid() and do:
>
> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = NULL;
> struct gendisk *disk = NULL;
> ...
>
> if (queue_is_mq(q)) {
> /*
> * If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset
> * the state. Like for the other success return cases, the
> * caller is responsible for checking if the IO completed. If
> * the IO isn't complete, we'll get called again and will go
> * straight to the busy poll loop. If specified not to spin,
> * we also should not sleep.
> */
> hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)];
> if (spin && blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, hctx, cookie))
> return 1;
> hctx->poll_considered++;
> } else {
> disk = queue_to_disk(q);
> }
>
> do {
> int ret;
>
> if (hctx)
> ret = blk_mq_poll(q, hctx, cookie);
> else if (disk->fops->iopoll)
> ret = disk->fops->iopoll(q, cookie);
>
Regards.
>> + if (ret > 0) {
>> + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
>> + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> +
>> + if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING)
>> + return 1;
>> + if (ret < 0 || !spin)
>> + break;
>> + cpu_relax();
>> + } while (!need_resched());
>> +
>> + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_poll);
>> +
>> /**
>> * blk_cloned_rq_check_limits - Helper function to check a cloned request
>> * for the new queue limits
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
>> index b09ce00cc6af..85258958e9f1 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>> @@ -3818,8 +3818,8 @@ static bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid_sleep(struct
>> request_queue *q,
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> -static bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q,
>> - struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie)
>> +bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q,
>> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie)
>> {
>> struct request *rq;
>>
>> @@ -3843,72 +3843,20 @@ static bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue
>> *q,
>> return blk_mq_poll_hybrid_sleep(q, rq);
>> }
>>
>> -/**
>> - * blk_poll - poll for IO completions
>> - * @q: the queue
>> - * @cookie: cookie passed back at IO submission time
>> - * @spin: whether to spin for completions
>> - *
>> - * Description:
>> - * Poll for completions on the passed in queue. Returns number of
>> - * completed entries found. If @spin is true, then blk_poll will continue
>> - * looping until at least one completion is found, unless the task is
>> - * otherwise marked running (or we need to reschedule).
>> - */
>> -int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin)
>> +int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie)
>> {
>> + int ret;
>> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
>> - long state;
>> -
>> - if (!blk_qc_t_valid(cookie) ||
>> - !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &q->queue_flags))
>> - return 0;
>> -
>> - if (current->plug)
>> - blk_flush_plug_list(current->plug, false);
>>
>> hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[blk_qc_t_to_queue_num(cookie)];
>
>
> Given my suggested code changes above, pass hctx in to blk_mq_poll() to
> avoid redundant code to access it in q->queue_hw_ctx[], so:
>
> int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q,
> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie)
>
Regards.
>> - /*
>> - * If we sleep, have the caller restart the poll loop to reset
>> - * the state. Like for the other success return cases, the
>> - * caller is responsible for checking if the IO completed. If
>> - * the IO isn't complete, we'll get called again and will go
>> - * straight to the busy poll loop. If specified not to spin,
>> - * we also should not sleep.
>> - */
>> - if (spin && blk_mq_poll_hybrid(q, hctx, cookie))
>> - return 1;
>> -
>> - hctx->poll_considered++;
>> + hctx->poll_invoked++;
>> + ret = q->mq_ops->poll(hctx);
>> + if (ret > 0)
>> + hctx->poll_success++;
>>
>> - state = current->state;
>> - do {
>> - int ret;
>> -
>> - hctx->poll_invoked++;
>> -
>> - ret = q->mq_ops->poll(hctx);
>> - if (ret > 0) {
>> - hctx->poll_success++;
>> - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
>> - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> -
>> - if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING)
>> - return 1;
>> - if (ret < 0 || !spin)
>> - break;
>> - cpu_relax();
>> - } while (!need_resched());
>> -
>> - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> - return 0;
>> + return ret;
>> }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_poll);
>>
>> unsigned int blk_mq_rq_cpu(struct request *rq)
>> {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
>> index 47b021952ac7..032e08ecd42e 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
>> @@ -607,6 +607,9 @@ static inline void blk_rq_bio_prep(struct request *rq,
>> struct bio *bio,
>> }
>>
>> blk_qc_t blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio);
>> +int blk_mq_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie);
>> +bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q,
>> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, blk_qc_t cookie);
>> void blk_mq_hctx_set_fq_lock_class(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>> struct lock_class_key *key);
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> index 2303d06a5a82..e8965879eb90 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> @@ -1845,6 +1845,7 @@ static inline void blk_ksm_unregister(struct
>> request_queue *q) { }
>>
>> struct block_device_operations {
>> blk_qc_t (*submit_bio) (struct bio *bio);
>> + int (*iopoll)(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie);
>> int (*open) (struct block_device *, fmode_t);
>> void (*release) (struct gendisk *, fmode_t);
>> int (*rw_page)(struct block_device *, sector_t, struct page *, unsigned
>> int);
>> --
>> 2.27.0
>>
>> --
>> dm-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>
--
Thanks,
Jeffle
--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
