Side stepping the pie fight here (although a language, simple or not,
that includes 'conditional' logic that doesn't apply under certain
conditions because it is "easier" begs an awful lot of questions), I
simply wonder if there is a way to solve my problem without resulting
to writing a set of template tags to do it.

On Feb 23, 12:54 pm, Shawn Milochik <sh...@milochik.com> wrote:
> Okay. If your point is that you understand the way it's meant to work and you 
> don't agree with it, then the answer to your question is that you can't do it 
> that way in Django's templating system.
>
> I don't know why the Django developers made that decision, but I'd bet it 
> makes template validation a lot easier on them. That's a good thing, 
> especially because the template system is meant to be about as simple as 
> possible. I agree with the general philosophy that as much logic as possible 
> should be kept out of templates. It also makes it a lot easier on 
> non-programming users who develop the templates for their developer 
> counterparts in an organization that separates those duties.
>
> If you don't want to use Django's templating system, you're free to replace 
> it. Some people prefer jinja2, which is a lot more 
> powerful:http://jinja.pocoo.org/2/
>
> Shawn

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to