If you're looking for something with some power off the bat (which it doesn't sound like you are), Amazon's EC2 (http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/) is amazing. If you start there, you can stay there right up to the point that you're bigger than amazon.com :) It has the same disadvantages of slicehost or linode as far as needing to set everything up yourself, but if you're going to be spending anything close to $70 on slicehost or linode, you'd be doing yourself a huge favor by starting with EC2.
Hope that helps -Wes On Oct 6, 1:30 pm, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am about to begin a new Django project and I am currently evaluating > hosting options. I know there has been a number of discussions on this > topic, and I have read most of them. However, seeing how quickly > things change in the web development / hosting world, I wanted to get > some opinions if the following summary still holds true. > > The most useful information I have found on Django hosting was > here:http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2008/jan/12/mt/ > > From this, and other sources, I believe the best hosting options to > be: > > 1. Web Faction - for those that want to get Django up and running as > quickly and easily as possible, using their automated setup. > > OR > > 2. Slicehost - for those that want COMPLETE control of their hosting > environment. Only drawback (for some) is that everything needs to be > installed from scratch. > > In the case of Slicehost, I am also curious if the 256 slice is > sufficient for most Django apps. > > I appreciate any thoughts or comments. > > Thanks! > > Jeff --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
