Ttry using pyobfuscate. It works really well with python 2.3 (run it using python 2.3 and only use it on python 2.3 compatible code). - Hugh
On 12/10/07, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > try java, or C or even BF > > On 11-Dec-07, at 10:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Shoot, so maybe Python just isn't the language for this kind of > > project. I'm not really concerned with making it bullet-proof to > > decompilation, just not so glaringly obvious as opening up the source > > files :) > > > > On Dec 10, 3:29 pm, "Jay Parlar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Dec 10, 2007 2:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> Or perhaps I'm reading into this too much. If I distribute the .pyc > >>> files minus the .py files, would that work? Is this machine- > >>> independent (IE: I "compile" the source on an x86, it'll be ok on > >>> a 64- > >>> bit or other architecture?) > >> > >> Anyone who *really* wanted to get at your code could do a decent job > >> of disassembling the .pyc files, there's not a lot going on in those. > >> In fact, I believe there used to be a commercial service that would > >> take .pyc files, and automatically convert them to .py > >> > >> And if I recall correctly, .pyc files are version dependent, machine > >> independent, but don't quote me on that :) > > > > > -- > > regards > kg > http://lawgon.livejournal.com > http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/ > Foss Conference for the common man: http://registration.fossconf.in/web/ > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
