Tim Chase wrote: > I think it's this historical baggage of non-ANSI-compliance for MySQL > that dings it to a lower status than PostgreSQL. As the newer, more > compliant versions of MySQL begin to be more available on hosting > services, this gap will close.
MySQL developers made many wrong choices, for the wrong reasons, all along its development. Even if they now promise to have the right features (and they still don't), I don't trust them with my data. It's little more than a shiny, broken toy. -- Nicola Larosa - http://www.tekNico.net/ You do have an automated test suite, right? And it does run periodically (daily or upon every check-in) in a continuous integration system, right? And you have everything set up so that you're notified by email or RSS feeds when something fails, right? And you fix failures quickly so that everything turns back to green, because you know that too much red, too often, leads to broken windows and bit rot, right? -- Grig Gheorghiu, February 2007 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
