On 22-Jul-07, at 11:33 AM, Nicola Larosa wrote:
>> I think it's this historical baggage of non-ANSI-compliance for MySQL >> that dings it to a lower status than PostgreSQL. As the newer, more >> compliant versions of MySQL begin to be more available on hosting >> services, this gap will close. > > MySQL developers made many wrong choices, for the wrong reasons, > all along > its development. Even if they now promise to have the right > features (and > they still don't), I don't trust them with my data. i was trying to find the old 3.x manuals for mysql where they vigorously argue against referntial integrity, transacations views and the like. The current versions of those manuals do not seem to have those sections any more - so how can you trust a group that is rewriting it's history? -- regards kg http://lawgon.livejournal.com http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
