On 6/27/07, Vance Dubberly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > ball of red tape but let's just say django is ALOT more resource intensive > and ALOT slower.
Have you done any profiling? I haven't compared such a port, but I'd be surprised if performance is significantly (i.e. one order) different without some optimization being missed. If you have, can you point to any parts of Django that we could improve? As presented, there's not much actionable. "Java is faster than Python" is not news, but I doubt the language is the problem here. Thanks! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
