Jeremy Dunck wrote: >> Frankly I think a generic python application server similar to tomcat >> would do a world of good for python apps in general. Something similar to >> cherrypy... but this is beyond the responsibilities of the django community >> which have plenty great work left. > > Similar to CherryPy but not it? How come? In any case, if you're > thinking this way, consider Aspen/Stephane: > http://www.zetadev.com/software/aspen/ > > It appears to be thread-per-request.
so all the usual issues (and non-issues) with the python GIL apply... btw. i never understood what's so nice about those pure-python (or pure-ruby (mongrel etc.)) web-servers.. for example regarding performance/memory-consumption/whatever, why should apache+mod_python be worse than a pure-python-web-server? let's say with the single-process multi-threaded apache-mode...? gabor --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
