I believe that's as designed. There's this part in the documentation of "Database transactions":
Callbacks are not run until autocommit is restored on the connection following the commit (because otherwise any queries done in a callback would open an implicit transaction, preventing the connection from going back into autocommit mode). So on_commit is meant as a connection level hook, not a transaction level one. On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:10 PM, <barthel...@infobart.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I believe that I encountered a bug or at least a serious limitation with > transaction.on_commit in Django 1.9.x. Essentially, the on_commit hooks > seem to be tied to the database connection instead of the transaction. This > means that unrelated transactions may trigger on_commit hooks, which > results in undesired execution order. Here is an example: > > from django.db import transaction > from foobar.models import Model1, Model2 > > > @transaction.atomic > def outer(): > print("START - OUTER") > for i in range(4): > f1(i) > print("END - OUTER") > > > @transaction.atomic > def f1(i): > model = Model1(description="test {0}".format(i)) > model.save() > transaction.on_commit(lambda: commit_hook(model, i)) > > > def commit_hook(model, i): > print("START - on_commit hook") > f2(i) > print("STOP - on_commit hook") > > > @transaction.atomic > def f2(i): > print("CALLING F2") > model = Model2(description="test {0}".format(i)) > model.save() > > > Some quick explanations: > > - outer is the outermost atomic block. f1 will only create a savepoint(). > This works as expected, there is only one commit (trace erased for > simplicity). > - f2 is wrapped in an "outermost" atomic block and indeed, f2 will be > called four times and there will be four commits (trace erased for > simplicity). > - f1 register a commit_hook. I expect that at the end of outer(), all > commit hooks will be called. > > > The expected trace is: > START - OUTER > END - OUTER > START - on_commit hook > CALLING F2 > STOP - on_commit hook > START - on_commit hook > CALLING F2 > STOP - on_commit hook > START - on_commit hook > CALLING F2 > STOP - on_commit hook > START - on_commit hook > CALLING F2 > STOP - on_commit hook > > The actual trace (f2 is triggering the on_commit hooks registered in > f1/outer): > START - OUTER > END - OUTER > START - on_commit hook > CALLING F2 > START - on_commit hook > CALLING F2 > START - on_commit hook > CALLING F2 > START - on_commit hook > CALLING F2 > STOP - on_commit hook > STOP - on_commit hook > STOP - on_commit hook > STOP - on_commit hook > > I wanted to know if someone encountered this issue or if I am > misunderstanding on_commit before opening a ticket. > > Regards, > Bart > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-users. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/5ddb1ee0-c27f-4cee-b28a-d8cca6d1cf5f%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/5ddb1ee0-c27f-4cee-b28a-d8cca6d1cf5f%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-users. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/CAD4ANxVxO8xLVfn48-vu6RnGhDSaAX_aMFXYbHAE%3DaSfugjXLw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.