On Saturday, June 7, 2014 6:07:52 AM UTC-4, Aseem Bansal wrote:
> > My main concern currently is that this project is turning out to have a > lot more jQuery than Python/HTML. Am I designing this incorrectly? I > understand that as my requirements are mostly asynchronous so there is a > need for javascript but redundancy like hard-coding URLs for autocomplete > in javascript is bothering me. Also am I over-engineering the Javascript? > Can't say I delved real deep into your efforts. My comments on your observations. A lot of us like django because there's less code involved. You can get around hard coding by rendering javascript (or some code segments) through the template engine. I find the simpler you keep javascript, the easier it is to maintain. Maybe HTML7 will encompass a new scripting language. ;) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/a10dfc86-ee00-4cb2-b50e-353f0d8f834c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
