Yes it is. But the book has its place. Or is leaving the book outdated an indirect way of telling us to use only the docs?
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Torsten Bronger < bron...@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > Hallöchen! > > Timothy Makobu writes: > > > The Django book is the best source of understanding Django I have > > found http://www.djangobook.com/en/2.0/ > > All books about Django share the same problem: The original > documentation is simply terrific, both for the beginner and the > expert. > > Tschö, > Torsten. > > -- > Torsten Bronger Jabber ID: torsten.bron...@jabber.rwth-aachen.de > or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django users" group. > To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
