Dear Dan,
[Reordering the message so that it is easier to see the connection.] Am Dienstag, den 18.10.2011, 06:46 -0700 schrieb Dan Gentry: > On Oct 18, 3:10 am, kenneth gonsalves <law...@thenilgiris.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 12:36 +0530, kenneth gonsalves wrote: > > > On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 23:45 -0700, Kevin wrote: > > > > Currently I have been focusing on the following: > > > > > > * Django 1.2 > > > > > 1.3 belongs to the stone age - since you are learning, it would be a > > > good idea to work with the current svn trunk, updating every week or > > > so. > > > -- > > > > s/1.2/1.3/ > With all due respect to Mr. Gonsalves, I do not care to work with the > Django trunk unless I'm just playing around with something. My goal > is always to produce a production quality application. Even the more > stable than average Django trunk cannot provide the consistency needed > to deliver an app to a customer. Plus, I don't need the extra work of > basing my code on a moving target. When trunk becomes v1.4, I will > convert my applications and upgrade. Please read the message you are referring to again. Kenneth corrected the post [2] (although the `sed`-command should be `s/1.3/1.2/`. »The latest official version is 1.3.1.« [1], so Kenneth suggested to use the current stable release. > I know - I'm a dinosaur. That has nothing to do with this. Thanks, Paul [1] https://www.djangoproject.com/download/ [2] http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Mailing_list_netiquette
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
