Bill de hÓra wrote: > For models and admin usage your storage will need to meet the DBAPI > contract. I think it can be done, but with considerable effort. I think > I'd wonder why bother tho' - the main reason I cna think of is for the > CMS case where users can create
...arbitrary content types (ie autogenerated models). That would be either table-on-demand or some uber-content-model (a la RDF/CMF/Archetypes) cheers Bill --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
