That patch I had already applied - thanks! :) --Tim
-----Original Message----- From: django-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ivan Sagalaev Sent: dinsdag 14 maart 2006 7:47 To: django-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Django on Windows? Leeuw van der, Tim wrote: >By searching for 'threading' in the ticket-database I've found ticket >1442, which provides a different approach: thread-local storage. (Each >thread it's own connection.) > > Yes, this is the fix that superseeded previous fixes for different backends. It's much cleaner of course. However with Postgres the problem with leaking open connections is much more visible. So you definitely should apply the second patch (that moves response middleware under connection management). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
