On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 21:10 -0500, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > We've used Django with mod_python for the past couple of years in a > production setting, so that's the most "proven" server arrangement. I > personally haven't used it with fcgi -- just haven't had the chance -- > so I'm not sure how fcgi compares. Can anybody else chime in?
Well, I should jump in and say that, even though my previous post may have sounded a little negative about fastcgi, fastcgi is my choice. Partly this is just because I have more experience with fastcgi than with mod_python, but it is also because fastcgi is a more general solution for replacing CGI, running PHP, etc. I'd be running mod_fastcgi anyway, so why not use it for Django? Another poster mentions SCGI. I've looked into that, but the Apache 2 module for it is unstable, according to the documentation, which rules it out for me. -- +----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Jason F. McBrayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | "If you wish to make Pythocles wealthy, don't give him more | | money; rather, reduce his desires." -- Epicurus |
