2005/9/13, Jason F. McBrayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 21:10 -0500, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > > > We've used Django with mod_python for the past couple of years in a > > production setting, so that's the most "proven" server arrangement. I > > personally haven't used it with fcgi -- just haven't had the chance -- > > so I'm not sure how fcgi compares. Can anybody else chime in? > > Well, I should jump in and say that, even though my previous post may > have sounded a little negative about fastcgi, fastcgi is my choice. > Partly this is just because I have more experience with fastcgi than > with mod_python, but it is also because fastcgi is a more general > solution for replacing CGI, running PHP, etc. I'd be running > mod_fastcgi anyway, so why not use it for Django? > > Another poster mentions SCGI. I've looked into that, but the Apache 2 > module for it is unstable, according to the documentation, which rules > it out for me.
SCGI is actually being used in production evironment with Apache2, here is more info: http://mail.mems-exchange.org/durusmail/quixote-users/4963/ -- Ksenia
