#33331: Improve exception handling with `cursor.close()` after errors
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Daniel Hahler        |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:                       |                   Status:  closed
  Cleanup/optimization               |
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  3.2
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:  needsinfo
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:
                                     |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by Daniel Hahler):

 Ok, fair enough - it is only fixing a regression on Python 3 then (for
 me), that was actually done as a workaround.

 I suggest reading the original tickets description maybe then: my
 intention was to not mask / "extend" the actual exception with more
 information (the (IMHO incorrectly chained) error during cleanup, that is
 expected to fail).  It is similar to a `file.close()` when it is expected
 that it wasn't created or its handler being invalid already.

 Replying to
 
https://github.com/django/django/commit/6b6be692fcd102436c7abef1d7b3fa1d37ad4bdf#r67292630:

 > The cleanup part of the chain adds noise to the actual source of the
 error, so maybe it can be improved. But that’s an improvement over the
 existing situation, not a regression.

 Ok, I see.  That's what I've meant to do: basically restoring the behavior
 with Python 3 (when the workaround for Python 2 was in place), while being
 a bit smarter to only ignore/swallow expected errors.
 I was not aware that the intention with the Python 2 workaround was to
 chain ("add useless noise") always with Python 3.

 The question here really is also: if you would know that the connection is
 invalid, and that `close()` would throw: would you call it in the first
 place?

 As for a new PR I'd rather update the existing one, but cannot re-open it
 as mentioned there.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/33331#comment:12>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/065.b98be212b2d500ea0a5e8dbc14782482%40djangoproject.com.

Reply via email to