Le jeudi 07 novembre 2013 à 20:25 -0200, Ramiro Morales a écrit : > Hi all, > > What do you think about implementing something like this?. > > This way we would reduce the final Django distribution file count > removing abandoned translations (some of them translations that > weren't even touched since added). > > We can post an announcement now early in the 1.7 dev cycle to give > people time to react and perhaps this can even serve as a motivation > trigger. (...)
Hi Ramiro, I would support this proposal but with one condition, we should lift the restriction that apps can only provide translations for which Django has also a translation. Imagine an app writer which doesn't reuse any Django string, but would like to provide translation for language xx, and language xx has only 4% of Django translated. The fact that Django contains only 4% of translated string doesn't affect him at all, but if we remove those translations, the xx translations for his app cannot be used at all (if the docs still reflect the reality). And of course, this would only apply to django-core, not documentation. https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/django-core/ Claude -- www.2xlibre.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django internationalization and localization" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-i18n+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-i18n@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-i18n. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
