Yes, there are tests for both #16502 and handling empty list of templates in 
third patch.  So separating `select_template` issue is only necessary?

On Friday, September 16, 2011 7:24:32 PM UTC+6, TiNo wrote:
>
> I think the get_model method serves well. As there are multiple ways to 
> define which model should be used (the self.model, self.queryset or 
> self.form_class attributes) it justifies having a utility function for it.
>
> If you write tests for #16502 that pass with #16502 fixed with the 
> get_model method things should be allright in my opinion.
>
> Tino
>
> 2011/9/16 Silver_Ghost <[email protected]>
>
>> I've already started on splitting patches so let me finish a work and 
>> separate tickets :)
>>
>> As I understand the problem, there should be patch without addition of 
>> `get_model` to resolve #16502 with tests, patch (and another ticket) which 
>> adds `get_model` with tests specially for `get_model` and patch (also in 
>> another ticket) for handling an empty list of candidates in 
>> `select_template`.  Is it right?
>>
>>
>> пятница, 16 сентября 2011 г. 15:12:16 UTC+6 пользователь TiNo написал:
>>
>>> I agree. But the problem is this: CreateView has a default template: 
>>> %app_name%/%model_**name%_form.html , however, it should raise an error 
>>> if no queryset or model is passed. The SingleObjectMixin-get_model.**diff 
>>> patch 
>>> does this. It just needs tests.
>>>  
>>> I would create a seperate ticket for handling an empty list of templates.
>>>
>>> Tino 
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 21:51, Aymeric Augustin <
>>> [email protected]**> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I think ticket #16502 should focus on the problem of CreateView: 
>>>> why doesn't it have a default template and does it need one?
>>>>
>>>> The other issues you discovered while investigating that problem should 
>>>> go into separate tickets.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Aymeric Augustin.
>>>>
>>>> On 15 sept. 2011, at 09:12, Silver_Ghost wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There is a 
>>>> comment<https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16502#comment:10>to ticket 
>>>> ticket 
>>>> #16502 <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16502> from *ptone*.  He 
>>>> recommends to create two new tickets, one for get_model patch and one 
>>>> for select_template patch.  In my opinion separating select_templatepatch 
>>>> is a good idea while separating 
>>>> get_model patch isn't.  This is because adding get_model method fully 
>>>> fixes ticket #16502.
>>>>
>>>> What should I do?  If creating two new tickets as *ptone* suggests is a 
>>>> right way then how to show relation between this three tickets?
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Django developers" group.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/**
>>>> msg/django-developers/-/zQT8_**CaxmyUJ<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-developers/-/zQT8_CaxmyUJ>
>>>> .
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-develop...@**
>>>> googlegroups.com.
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>>>> group/django-developers?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Django developers" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-develop...@**
>>>> googlegroups.com.
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>>>> group/django-developers?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Django developers" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-developers/-/JNNtKtXZ7LQJ.
>>
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-developers/-/m9Sd5JMgBGwJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.

Reply via email to