On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 19:04, Rich Bowen <rbo...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > On 2021/08/30 17:09:02, Dave Fisher <wave4d...@comcast.net> wrote: > > I’ve glanced at the scans and in general I don’t see these as helpful. I > > don’t want to put my volunteer time into “fixing” or reviewing this. The > > word “master” is in the specifications we implement. > > > > Unless someone objects I will remove most if not all our repositories from > > this “service” in 72 hours. > > You are in no way obliged to make use of the service. If it's not helpful, > then don't use it.
"We ask that people do not add or remove project repositories without prior notice ..." I read that as: D&I don't need permission to scan a project and (potentially) report it as problematic, but projects do need permission to stop the scan. Sorry, but although I think it's a good initiative to try and reduce non-inclusive language in ASF code and documentation, it has been introduced in a way that is likely to be counter-productive. It is pretty obvious to anyone who looks at any of the projects with a high number of contentious words that false positives abound. Did no-one think to check some of the outliers why they had such a high hit-rate? Very disappointed. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: diversity-unsubscr...@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: diversity-h...@apache.org
