sure thing, Gris. happy to wait

On Sun, 19 May 2019 at 02:32, Griselda Cuevas <g...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Hi Naomi,
>
> I'd like to propose an alternative approach, how about we first agree on a
> set of values we want to define the committee (and the Foundation on the
> D&I front), and the goals we want to achieve as a community. From there we
> can define guidelines.
>
> To me guidelines need to be in alignment to the values we choose as a
> community and the goals we want to achieve together, that's why I am
> suggesting we define those things first.
>
> So, the succinct proposal would be to first define values and goals, then
> the guidelines.
>
> I also think we could benefit from allowing the creation of the
> dev@diversity mailing list first, so the committee has a space to
> collaborate and discuss these topics.
>
> How does this sound?
>
> On Sat, May 18, 2019, 8:00 AM Naomi Slater <n...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>
> > thanks for the tip Justin
> >
> > I'm glad that there's been some progress on this since I was last
> actively
> > involved with the Incubator. and it's cool to see that the CouchDB bylaws
> > have had some sort of influence on this!
> >
> > I think it's probably a good idea that podlings are advised not to create
> > their own community guidelines. primarily, because it's easy to get
> things
> > wrong when you're so new to the Apache Way
> >
> > (in fact, a bit of backstory: the reason we made the bylaws for CouchDB
> is
> > precisely because we managed to graduate the incubator with a very wrong
> > set of ideas about how to approach consensus building and decision
> making.
> > I joined the Incubator and mentored a few projects and taught myself the
> > proper ways of doing things with a bit more experience under my belt, and
> > went back to the CouchDB community and reformed how we did things. the
> > bylaws were an artifact of that process)
> >
> > having said that, we have a number of very seasoned people on this
> > committee, and I don't think there's a risk here re our community
> > guidelines not being inline with how the ASF operates
> >
> > the sections of the CouchDB bylaws I think we could get the most value
> from
> > are 3.1 Lazy Consensus (https://couchdb.apache.org/bylaws.html#lazy),
> 3.2.
> > Discussion
> > (https://couchdb.apache.org/bylaws.html#discussion), and the
> specification
> > that Lazy Majority is used for non-technical decisions that move to
> formal
> > voting. 4.1. Subject Tags (https://couchdb.apache.org/bylaws.html#tags)
> > might be handy too
> >
> > I am not sure how apparent it is from the CouchDB bylaws, but they were
> > designed as a tool to cut through long, exhausting arguments which were
> > plaguing the community at the time. and in that respect they were quite
> > successful
> >
> > we have already seen, these past few months, that when it comes to D&I,
> > there is a major risk that discussions and decision making get
> out-of-hand
> > even when the people involved have decades of combined shared Apache
> > experience
> >
> > additionally, we're not a software project, so we're not going to be
> making
> > any technical decisions. so, having some clarity in the form of an agreed
> > upon and documented approach to non-technical decision making seems
> > especially valuable
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 18 May 2019 at 01:40, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > And recently even those have seem to have gone out of favour as many of
> > > them contained things that were not in line with how the ASF works or
> its
> > > policies. Podlings are asked not to create them on graduation.
> > >
> > > For procedural things (voting and the like) I just point podlings to
> > this.
> > > [1] These were approved by the board.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > 1.
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/DefaultProjectGuidelines
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: diversity-unsubscr...@apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: diversity-h...@apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to