El 2022-03-01 13:22, netcitizen escribió: >> Quiliro Ordóñez [1] wrote: >> >> I have just asked Richard directly. > > What do you expect him to respond? Something in the lines of, "It's > OK, I don't want to speak at LP"? Or maybe, "It's OK, I don't need > your support"?
I asked him more general questions. I will cite them to this list when he responds. > How is he supposed to get back his right to speak if his supporters > don't speak up while his attackers keep up in arms without rest? Maybe he does not need some of his supporters to do what they do. When he needs someone's help, he always asks. > I don't think he would've been able to go back to the board without > the dozens of emails arrived at the FSF and hundreds of people > speaking up for him. I do not know about it. Perhaps he thought that by leaving the board, FSF would stop being pestered. We cannot assure anything unless we ask the first source. >> Otherwise, it is just gossip. > > What exactly do you consider gossip here? The LP schedule published > without Stallman's name on it? Leah Rowe's honest question? My > bringing the issue to the attention of this list? Something else? What I mean is not gossip in the sense of malicious speaking. But rather what I mean is distorsion by not getting the information directly from the source. Relying on the interpretation of what someone else thinks is not very factual and cannot give people a chance of relying on their own methods of interpreting what is really happening. Please excuse my poor English. It is a poor language in my mind's resources. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
