Matthew Garrett <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 06:53:57PM -0500, quiliro wrote: > >> Something that is "backed up by an array of publicly available >> evidence." This you have said. But you have not shown. A web page is not >> first hand testimonies. > > Yes it is. > >> The author is the only first hand testimony if it is verifiable. First >> hand testimonies must not only be shown. Those testimonies must also >> demonstrate that someone was penetrated sexually. > > They do. > >> That defines rape. Also, if someone says something, that does not mean >> it is true. So proof is something much more complicated than what you >> are presenting and requires much more verification. > > So, again, what do you mean by "proof"? What do you need to see here?
A "yes it is"/"no it isn't" discussion will get us nowhere. In the end, no facts are in those words, just opinions. Unless you support with other evidence, I will not be convinced and will regard them as false accusations. I will drop it from now with you because you will not contribute anything useful. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
