Hi Paul, Am Freitag 27 September 2019 18:00:28 schrieb Paul Boddie: > It seemed to me when I last looked at any minutes from FSFE meetings that a > lot of people eligible to vote were either delegating their votes to the > leadership or just not voting at all.
those formal meetings of the association are best done briefly. This keeps the minutes small and makes it easy for the tax and courts to verify that it is formally fine. This is good as it is a formal framework. The actually work is not in different times and places. > Admittedly, > the rest of us don't tend to do things like park $100000 destined for > improving Free Software in a bank account for four years This is book-keeping, the association is the formal employer of people and because some incomes and costs for FSFE's mission come unplanned, we want to make sure there is a reserve so we can be a proper employer. Because FSFE is a public charity we must give a reason for the reserve. > and not communicate with the people whose money that was, > but apart from small things like that. People trust us to treat other people fine, this includes being a good employers, paying all releveant social security taxes and a lot more. I don't believe we should communicate all those details which are "normal" for an organisation that has a few employees. On the scale of what FSFE does, we write, microblog and even video a lot, this increases over time. For this year I've quick-counted 26 entries on https://fsfe.org/news/news.en.html so far. > I think that after a while it becomes tiresome to play the games of > convincing people supposedly working towards the same goals to step outside > their comfort zone and to pay attention to matters of genuine concern > amongst those who support and fund the organisation. The main concern of FSFE is furthering Free Software, empower people and society in the area of software technology. As there are many volunteers within FSFE and we are all humans, there are different ideas how to pursue this goal. And from them there are directions formed (and asked and communicated about). This also means that no all ideas can be followup on equally. Still what we as social group FSFE know is evolving, this process is never to end for the good, because the world keeps turning. > Democratic mechanisms are meant to provide ways of informing > the leadership and direction of organisations; removing them puts an > obligation on the organisation to discover whether it is still doing the > right thing by its supporters. FSFE has this obligation anyway, which is good. Also if our supporters were in the majority going to support non-free software, FSFE cannot follow suit because this is outside the limits of our constitution. There are many way how supporters, (previously) external people and folks can influence what we (as FSFE) do and where we go. One is to bring up a good idea here on the public discussion list or voice it in one of the meetings. > Now, there was that FSFE-in-2020 survey done a while back. I asked about it > again in February, but no response was forthcoming. Answered now, sorry for the late response, thanks for the reminder. > (Which brings me to the matter of FSFE's opaque legal conference that may > or may not be funded by the supporters, out of which they get a list of > vague topic headings and reassurances that it was a worthwhile exercise.) The conference is mainly a meeting of the legal network, see https://fsfe.org/activities/ftf/ln.en.html and we report on it each year. The main advantage of the meeting that people can exchange themselves, so there is no direct aim for a result. (FSFE was criticised before for not forcing the agenda, but most people in FSFE believe that we cannot force people's opinion, while it is good at the same time to bring people together that are genuinely interested in Free Software licensing together.) https://fsfe.org/news/nl/nl-201907.en.html only has a short report and it could be longer. The one from 2018 almost seems too long for most readers https://fsfe.org/news/2018/news-20180530-02.de.html Some donors of FSFE specifically sponsor the Legal conference, so I'd personally expect this actually to be something that financially supports other activies of FSFE. However this probably varies from year to year. Best Regards, Bernhard -- FSFE -- Founding Member Support our work for Free Software: blogs.fsfe.org/bernhard https://fsfe.org/donate | contribute
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
