Thanks!! I will have a look.
On Thursday, August 4, 2016 10:59 AM, Scott Lowe <scott.l...@scottlowe.org>
wrote:
Please see my response below.
On Aug 3, 2016, at 8:52 PM, Yinon <yinonby....@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hello,
I have a question about ovs and vxlan tunnels.
I am interested in ovs as a vswitch in order to achieve the following
topology:I have 2 nodes, each with 1 NIC interface, say eth0. I would like to
have 2 networks (subnets) without using vlans, say 10.100.1.0/24 and
10.200.1.0/24.
So something like a bridge, say br-ex, with eth0 added to it.
And 2 internal-type ports on that bridge, say port-100 and port-200. port-100
is assigned an IP from subnet 10.100.1.0/24, and port-200 from 10.200.1.0/24.
Traffic that enters the bridge via eth0 on vxlan 100 will be decapsulated and
forwarded to port-100, and traffic that enters on vxlan 200 will be
decapsulated and forwarded to port-200. in the opposite direction vxlan will be
encapsulated accordingly.
I can probably do it with openflow rules, but was wondering if there is a more
elegant way, using vxlan-type ports?
Have a look at the OVS articles on my web site
(<http://blog.scottlowe.org/tags/#OVS>). I have some posts there on doing
exactly what you're describing using GRE, but the concepts should be the same
for VXLAN. Sorry I can't give you a more specific link; standing in line to
board an airplane at the moment. :-)
-- Scott
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
