Please see my response below.
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 8:52 PM, Yinon <yinonby....@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a question about ovs and vxlan tunnels. > I am interested in ovs as a vswitch in order to achieve the following > topology: > I have 2 nodes, each with 1 NIC interface, say eth0. I would like to have 2 > networks (subnets) without using vlans, say 10.100.1.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24. > > So something like a bridge, say br-ex, with eth0 added to it. > And 2 internal-type ports on that bridge, say port-100 and port-200. port-100 > is assigned an IP from subnet 10.100.1.0/24, and port-200 from 10.200.1.0/24. > Traffic that enters the bridge via eth0 on vxlan 100 will be decapsulated and > forwarded to port-100, and traffic that enters on vxlan 200 will be > decapsulated and forwarded to port-200. in the opposite direction vxlan will > be encapsulated accordingly. > > I can probably do it with openflow rules, but was wondering if there is a > more elegant way, using vxlan-type ports? Have a look at the OVS articles on my web site (<http://blog.scottlowe.org/tags/#OVS>). I have some posts there on doing exactly what you're describing using GRE, but the concepts should be the same for VXLAN. Sorry I can't give you a more specific link; standing in line to board an airplane at the moment. :-) -- Scott
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
