On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 05:27:31PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Flavio Leitner <f...@sysclose.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 01:30:03PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Flavio Leitner <f...@sysclose.org> wrote: > >> > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 12:35:34PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >> >> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 09:36:47AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >> >> > LF expects OVS to be a rather small budgetary burden, due to the > >> >> > project's simple structure. The TSC will coordinate with LF for any > >> >> > budgetary needs. [...] > >> > You also mentioned that VMware is on board, so I assume that we have > >> > at least one official sponsor signing in? > >> > > >> > I suspect some companies out there would be willing to support OVS, > >> > but it's not clear what will be required to signing in and/or the > >> > advantages to do so. > >> > >> I think it would ultimately be up to the Linux Foundation to decide > >> how to handle this. Obviously, anything along these lines would not > >> conflict with the structure set out by the proposed charter. > > > > Sort of, I see that as a requirement for the proposed charter to > > succeed. A small budget is still a budget and it is not clear if > > Linux Foundation will provide it or if the project needs other > > sponsors as well. > > The Linux Foundation is aware of the current budget (which is minimal > with the exception of the conference) and has said they are willing to > cover it as part of their general funds. Obviously if there was a
That answers my question. Thanks Jesse! -- fbl _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
