> -----Original Message----- > From: haris tanvir [mailto:haristan...@hotmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 7:41 PM > To: Traynor, Kevin > Cc: discuss@openvswitch.org > Subject: RE: [ovs-discuss] ovs 2.4 dpdk ports > > What would be the difference if rather than assigning a Guest machine > "dpdkvhostuser" ports, i directly assign them "dpdk" physical ports? Would > the performance improve?
I'm not sure I understand the question. Do you mean using SR-IOV or something else? > > > > > From: kevin.tray...@intel.com > > To: haristan...@hotmail.com; discuss@openvswitch.org > > Subject: RE: [ovs-discuss] ovs 2.4 dpdk ports > > Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:19:36 +0000 > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of haris > > > tanvir > > > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 8:57 AM > > > To: discuss@openvswitch.org > > > Subject: [ovs-discuss] ovs 2.4 dpdk ports > > > > > > Can someone explain the difference between(and elaborate) the following > types > > > of ports in ovs 2.4 > > > > > > 1. dpdk > > physical NIC ports > > > > > 2. dpdkr > > dpdk ring ports, they can be used to read/write memory shared through > ivshmem > > > > > 3. dpdkvhostuser > > qemu vhostuser ports > > > > Have a look through the dpdk documentation http://www.dpdk.org/doc > > or the INSTALL.DPDK.md > > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
