What would be the difference if rather than assigning a Guest machine "dpdkvhostuser" ports, i directly assign them "dpdk" physical ports? Would the performance improve?
> From: kevin.tray...@intel.com > To: haristan...@hotmail.com; discuss@openvswitch.org > Subject: RE: [ovs-discuss] ovs 2.4 dpdk ports > Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:19:36 +0000 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of haris > > tanvir > > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 8:57 AM > > To: discuss@openvswitch.org > > Subject: [ovs-discuss] ovs 2.4 dpdk ports > > > > Can someone explain the difference between(and elaborate) the following > > types > > of ports in ovs 2.4 > > > > 1. dpdk > physical NIC ports > > > 2. dpdkr > dpdk ring ports, they can be used to read/write memory shared through ivshmem > > > 3. dpdkvhostuser > qemu vhostuser ports > > Have a look through the dpdk documentation http://www.dpdk.org/doc > or the INSTALL.DPDK.md >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
