"balance-slb" as I understand hashes the flows based on the MAC addresses. So if you are sending traffic between two VM's using iperf woulnd't the MAC address be the same? So I would think it should hash consistently a link (excepting for when re-balancing happens).
Vinay On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Nussbaum, Jacob <jdnu...@ilstu.edu> wrote: > I neglected to mention that I’ve been using iperf between the virtual > hosts on S1 to test the mirror and bonding. Not sure if this makes a > difference in how this would work. > > > > Jacob > > > > *From:* discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] *On Behalf Of > *Nussbaum, > Jacob > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 2, 2014 9:59 PM > *To:* 'discuss@openvswitch.org' > *Subject:* [ovs-discuss] OVS Bonding only using 1 link > > > > Hello all, > > I have another bonding issue with OVS I was hoping someone could help with. > > > > I have two virtual machines. Each with 5 network interfaces (eth0 > –eth4). Eth1-4 are bonded between the two VM’s. The mininet VM has > multiple “hosts” that I have the traffic mirrored over the bonded port > (bond0) to the other VM. > > > > Now everything seems to work ok, but I have it configured for balance-slb > mode and it only seems to use one link at a time. I’ve passed hundreds of > Gb’s across this network and it will only use one Network Interface at a > time. > > > > Did I mess up the configuration on this? > > > > Jacob > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > discuss@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > -- Vinay Bannai Email: vban...@gmail.com Google Voice: 415 938 7576
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
