On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:


On Dec 2, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 01:30:08PM +0100, Mijo Safradin wrote:


It fails on master and on older git versions as well. Even using Debian Sid,
the same errors could be observed. Can you provide hardware details about
the power/s390 machines the mentioned test has been executed on?

Basics about the machines are in the Debian machine database:

The mips machine: https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=corelli
The powerpc machine: https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=poulenc
The s390 machine: https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=zandonai


thanks

When using the openvswitch-2.3.0.tar.gz release, most of the failed test do
pass, but other tests do fail.

All the tests you show failing below relate to ssl.  This is probably
unrelated to endianness.  Please take a look at the testsuite log to
find the details.

Here's a subset of test which do fail on master and passed on 2.3.0

I'd suggest doing a "git bisect" run to find the point at which tests
started failing due to endian problems.


Ok, I did 'git bisect' for the first failing test case, which is
 'flow classifier - lookup segmentation'
No. 79 on master
No. 78 at bisect bad commit

...
[root@s390x ovs-test]# git bisect bad
a64759f02d8324caf6c37af0ac4e3e1d26e02a43 is the first bad commit
commit a64759f02d8324caf6c37af0ac4e3e1d26e02a43
Author: Jarno Rajahalme <jrajaha...@nicira.com>
Date:   Fri Jun 13 10:38:05 2014 -0700

   lib/classifier: Optimize megaflows for single rule case.

   When, during a classifier lookup, we narrow down to a single potential
   rule, it is enough to match on ("unwildcard") one bit that differs
   between the packet and the rule.

   This is a special case of the more general algorithm, where it is
   sufficient to match on enough bits that separates the packet from all
   higher priority rules than the matched rule.  For a miss that would be
   all the rules.  Implementing this is expensive for a more than a few
   rules.  This patch starts by doing this for a single rule when we
   already have it, also reducing the lookup cost by finishing the lookup
   earlier than before.

   Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jrajaha...@nicira.com>
   Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>

:040000 040000 e912f31d212ce362445ee961447e1bc3c7ff393a
d0006051050c1e73a83811909f583d7d38b73229 M      lib
:040000 040000 2cbd9fba63166d7037843de87d150a4b47a79260
be70c481bc5241662029436eb79b520f6067512f M      tests
...

It looks like the patch is not part of the 2.3.0 release, which
explains why the test doesn't fail using this release.

The fact that 'maskp' comes in LE order doesen't hurt here.

Thanks for narrowing it down.

Jarno, can you take a look and figure out a nice way to make this code
work properly on both little-endian and big-endian systems?

Sure. Was there any log file of the failed test case?

 Jarno



Hi Jarno,

sure, the complete log file for all tests, including this failing one
has been attached to the first thread email.
see complete log at
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/2014-November/015678.html

Here's a subset of the testlog for the corresponding test case
----
#                             -*- compilation -*-
79. classifier.at:27: testing flow classifier - lookup segmentation ...
...
Final flow: tcp,in_port=1,vlan_tci=0x0000,dl_src=50:54:00:00:00:05,dl_dst=50:54:00:00:00:07,nw_src=192.168.0.1,nw_dst=192.168.0.2,nw_tos=0,nw_ecn=0,nw_ttl=128,tp_src=8,tp_dst=80,tcp_flags=0
Megaflow: recirc_id=0,ip,in_port=1,nw_dst=0.0.0.0/0.1.0.1,nw_frag=no
Datapath actions: drop
./classifier.at:47: tail -2 stdout
--- -   2014-11-18 13:48:47.336261165 +0100
+++ /root/ovs-test/tests/testsuite.dir/at-groups/79/stdout 2014-11-18 13:48:47.324447317 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-Megaflow: recirc_id=0,ip,in_port=1,nw_dst=0.0.0.0/2.0.0.0,nw_frag=no
+Megaflow: recirc_id=0,ip,in_port=1,nw_dst=0.0.0.0/0.1.0.1,nw_frag=no
 Datapath actions: drop
---

Thanks,
Mijo

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to