On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:51:54AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 02:21:09PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > Since fedora has openvswitch packages available I wonder > > if it makes sense to keep maintaining the same in > > openvswitch package. > > > > For instance, I've added systemd units to better integrate > > with systemd. See this bug below: > > Provide native systemd unit files and fix startup dependency > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818754 > > > > Also this one: > > Bug 1006412 - openvswitch fails to start > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006412 > > > > The ovsdbmonitor package is now optional (dependency issues). > > > > You can propose changes to the spec using bugzilla anyway. > > > > Since the spec file is open and available in the internet, > > can we drop it and its source files from the openvswitch > > git repo? > > I think that the main purpose of the in-tree Fedora packaging is to > provide a convenience to Fedora users. If the packaging doesn't > actually help Fedora users, then I agree that removing it seems like a > good idea. > > Do any other Fedora users have opinions to share? Have you heard anything on this?
fbl _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
