On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 02:21:09PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote: > Since fedora has openvswitch packages available I wonder > if it makes sense to keep maintaining the same in > openvswitch package. > > For instance, I've added systemd units to better integrate > with systemd. See this bug below: > Provide native systemd unit files and fix startup dependency > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818754 > > Also this one: > Bug 1006412 - openvswitch fails to start > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006412 > > The ovsdbmonitor package is now optional (dependency issues). > > You can propose changes to the spec using bugzilla anyway. > > Since the spec file is open and available in the internet, > can we drop it and its source files from the openvswitch > git repo?
I think that the main purpose of the in-tree Fedora packaging is to provide a convenience to Fedora users. If the packaging doesn't actually help Fedora users, then I agree that removing it seems like a good idea. Do any other Fedora users have opinions to share? _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
