On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 07:53:31PM +0400, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: > On Sep 27, 2013 7:41 PM, "Ben Pfaff" <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0400, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: > > > 2013/9/27 Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>: > > > > It could mean that the port didn't really change status, or that you > > > > misunderstand the definition of status in this context, or that OVS > has > > > > a bug. > > > > > > Hmm. If i do something like ovs-vsctl add-port ovs-vm vnet100 (vnet100 > > > not exists) > > > does vSwitch must send port_status message to controller? > > > (in case of real exiting port added via libvirt nothing changed) > > > > If you use ovs-vsctl to "add" a port that does not really exist, then > > OVS cannot really add the port, so OVS will not send a port_status > > message. > > If this port has type internal does ovs send message?
Yes, it should. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
