On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0400, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: > 2013/9/27 Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>: > > It could mean that the port didn't really change status, or that you > > misunderstand the definition of status in this context, or that OVS has > > a bug. > > Hmm. If i do something like ovs-vsctl add-port ovs-vm vnet100 (vnet100 > not exists) > does vSwitch must send port_status message to controller? > (in case of real exiting port added via libvirt nothing changed)
If you use ovs-vsctl to "add" a port that does not really exist, then OVS cannot really add the port, so OVS will not send a port_status message. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
