On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:04 PM, krishna kumar <ipow...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Thanks for your reply! > Not sure if I understood what you said correctly... please correct me if I'm > wrong. > The two subnets are each behind a router which has a public IP. > Then the 10.x.x.x has a GRE tunnel interface with remote ip of 108.x.x.x and > vice versa. > I have also setup a DNAT in the firewall to forward any packet to 108.x.x.x > with protocol 47 to 192.168.x.x (VM). > And I also added a flow that says any traffic from 10.x.x.x to 192.168.x.x > should goto GRE tunnel interface. > It seems it is working fine. The ICMP request from 10.x.x.x to 192.168.x.x > is getting encapsulated and the GRE packets are received on the 192.168.x.x > network. But the ICMP reply is not generated on the 192.168.x.x side. > > Not sure where we would need another router between these two subnets.
I don't understand why you are using NAT here. Isn't 108 the subnet of the GRE endpoint and 192.168 the subnet of the host inside the tunnel? _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
