On Fri, 7 May 2010, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > Resent, as original got lost in moderation. > > John BORIS wrote: >> I am looking for a Version control system that will fit correctly in my >> environment. I manage a few applications, web sites and a servers. I am >> looking for a version control system that is: >> >> 1. Open Source (Free Software) >> 2. Server based >> 3. Windows client >> 4. Easy Reporting >> >> I need the repository on my network which is behind a firewall and that >> my programmers , two are located remotely, can access it. Our >> programming environment is a Windows Graphical Package (AcuCorp's >> AcuBench) and on the unix side is using vi, yes vi. > > No arguments from me about using vi. > > I no longer recommend Subversion for anything. There are better tools, > and they come down to Mercurial and Git. Since you have Windows clients, > that rules out Git.
It shouldn't rule out git. Why do you think that it needs to? > Mercurial has better windows clients than does Git. This may be true, but that shouldn't rule out git automatically. David Lang _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lopsa.org http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
