On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Yves Dorfsman <y...@zioup.com> wrote:
> Will people still use NAT with IPv6? I really, really, really hope not. NAT has always seemed to me to introduce more problems than it solves; and it's led to so many horribly hacky solutions and systems (STUN, SIP reflectors, Skype's bandwidth vampires, one-way mappings in firewalls, ugh) that the opportunity to do without it entirely in IPv6 is just such a relief. There are other mechanisms in IPv6 for obfuscation and "hiding the internal infrastructure" - see RFC3041 for example. Anybody worked for a medium size organisation with several thousand nodes > and IPv6? What did you/they do? > No NAT; RFC3041; firewalls between sensitive networks. Colm -- Colm Buckley / c...@tuatha.org / +353 87 2469146
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lopsa.org http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
