Hot Diggety! Benjamin Krueger was rumored to have written:
> This story came out yesterday. A public school utilized webcams in
> laptops to spy on children and their families both at school and at
> home. The practice came to light after the Principal reprimanded a
> student for behavior at home, using a picture from a webcam as
> evidence.

UPDATE: The school district has responded with an announcement saying:

http://www.lmsd.org/sections/news/default.php?m=0&t=today&p=lmsd_anno&id=1137

        1) This feature is now disabled

        2) They only used it to try and identify the culprit had the
           laptop been lost, missing, or stolen, and for no other reason

        3) It was an Apple (MacBook perhaps?)

        4) If this feature is reenabled, it will only be done after
           written notification is given to students and their parents

#2 is not plausible /if/ the original lawsuit's allegation is true; that
the parents were contacted by the school regarding webcam-captured
behavior of their child when there was no allegation of loss.

In the Gizmodo article, a quoted student says the active indicator would
come on frequently while at home, so that would seem to cast doubt on
the district's claim #2 (see above list) if this is true.

More disturbingly, if this camera was coming on frequently outside of
school hours -- evenings and weekends, I have to wonder if there were
adult(s) spending significant amount of time obtaining illegal
gratification. Quite a creepy thought. Even during the day, I'd
seriously not want any outsider knowing when the house was empty
(burglary risk -- especially since this is an affluent area).

Corporate employers with company-issued equipment are generally allowed
to monitor employee use of equipment and premises. But to be on the safe
side, we make it clear employees may potentially be monitored, including
their use of computers, and require their signature (after an
opportunity to ask any questions or consult a third party) to be given
access. There are still limitations such as not monitoring in areas that
has a reasonable expectation of privacy such as restrooms, though.

The district probably should've just stuck to application and system
logging and logfile analysis along with apps that blocks or grant access
to resources, for verification of permissible activity. *And* also, more
clearly disclosed the extent and full implications of monitoring to
parents in advance.

Who needs software trojans when you've got the ultimate Trojan Horse
right there in plain view??? The district folks are apparently avid
students of classical Roman poetry; I'll grant them that much.

-Dan

P.S. The story of the Trojan Horse was from Virgil's poem, _The Aeneid_.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lopsa.org
http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to