On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Matt Okeson-Harlow <m...@technomage.net> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:56:44AM -0800, Atom Powers wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Richard Chycoski >> <rskiad...@chycoski.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Installed in 1999 by a large software company, I suspect it's pretty >> decent cable. All currently on 66-blocks but I'm going to try to get >> it moved to patch panels. If not, then I won't even bother. > > Why not use the existing cable as your string to pull cat5 through? > With real cat5, you would not be limited to only voip. >
Because I'm not planning to pull new CAT5 to those offices. They already have 2x CAT5 and 2x CAT3. While I only /need/ two runs, it would be a shame if I couldn't find a use for the CAT3. -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers-- _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lopsa.org http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
