da...@lang.hm wrote: > 1. For most companies there is a huge amount of sensitive stuff in the > things that are going to be exposed (even if it's just e-mail) > > 2. For most of the things that it makes sense to expose there are good, > well-tested protocols available to do allow secure access. However > Microsoft has decided not to support those protocols. Letting them invent > something new to try and let their existing software tunnel seems wrong. > > 3. Microsoft doesn't have a good track record when creating new protocols, > so I would not want to try and use this until it's been out for a little > while and people have had a chance to beat on it. > > David Lang >
Heaven knows I have no desire to be an apologist, but this appears to be changing. Remember, currently, MS has the best (in terms of complete feature set, error recover, robustness) ISCSI implementation of all the major OS vendors right now, including and especially Linux. (I haven't checked Sol 10 U8 as of this writing) 2 and 1 are spot-on though. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lopsa.org http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
