Sure!

For transparency: It's for O'Reilly. This is meant to be the sort of document used in "Sign up for SuchAndSo list and we'll give you this free paper." So it'll be free in any case.

And I like to think it'll be worth reading! :-)

Michael Ryder wrote:
Esther

Will you be sharing your whitepaper with this email list when it's completed?

Thanks

Mike

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Esther Schindler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I'm mostly staying quiet at the moment because I want y'all to
    speak, rather than I.

    But I have a quizzical expression on my face, in particular for
    those who don't find one-on-ones useful. I'd love to hear more
    about your reasons for feeling that way.

    And in particular -- for everyone -- please tell me what you
    expect to happen in a one-on-one. What is talked about? What
    isn't? (What SHOULD be? What SHOULDN'T be? Who should make those
    decisions?)

    Because if we each have different expectations about what such a
    meeting is, we'll respond to it differently.

    For instance, it kind of sounds as though some people see "one on
    one" as if it's an employee review. ("Here is what you are doing
    well and what needs improvement.") For someone else it might be a
    boss' to-do list ("first, get THIS done, then work on that") --
    which would be annoying if you both already know what the
    priorities are.

    So, especially if you find these meetings annoying or too
    frequent... what (if anything) could a manager (or client!) say or
    do to make your life easier? (In regard to communication or lack
    thereof.)

    Peter Loron wrote:

    I’ve never found 1-1 meetings to be very useful for me. If I am
    not on track or am failing somehow, come grab me immediately and
    let me know. If I’m kicking ass, come grab me and let me know.
    Other than that, stay out of my hair and let me get stuff done.
    No reason to schedule anything. If there’s a reason to talk, then
    do it immediately. If there’s no reason, then don’t waste my time.

    -Pete

    *From: *<[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of Matthew
    Butch <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Date: *Friday, July 8, 2016 at 06:34
    *To: *Esther Schindler <[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Cc: *Discuss <[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject: *Re: [lopsa-discuss] Attention hive mind: Advice on
    doing one-on-one meetings?

    From the employee side- I HATED weekly scheduled one on ones.
    That’s way too frequent and interrupted my workflow. I would say
    at max once a month, though I could see longer time frames
    depending on the person- every other month, every three or every
    six (the max it should be). Honestly, I think it depends on the
    employee, and maybe depends on where they are at in their career.
    I’d probably review the frequency every six months.

    Scheduled is probably a good so that employees know they have
    time with their manager, and can prepare.

    Be absolutely clear about what it is for. I had one manager who
    clearly started them because he wanted to start controlling and
    micromanaging us, and I hated that.

    The agenda that I prefer is a free form discussion of what ever
    the employee wants to talk about, maybe with a few prompting
    questions- How’s the work/life balance, how’s the stress level,
    anything bugging you, where do you want to go in your career. I
    don’t want it to be status updates  (where are you at on this
    project, etc) because those are for team meetings or I can
    approach my manager separately as needed instead of waiting.

    I can certainly fill in more details about my experience if you
    need it.

    I hope that helps!

        On Jul 7, 2016, at 17:22, Esther Schindler
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Once again I'd like your input. I like to think the subject
        is interesting enough that you'll enjoy responding.

        This obviously isn't networking-related, but it certainly is
        germane to techies. Or, really, to anyone who works in a
        corporate environment.

        I’m writing a white paper that aims to give advice to
        creative workers (and to software developers in particular)
        about how to do one-on-ones well, in a way that benefits
        everyone (manager, employee, company… heck, the whole world).
        Fortunately, this isn’t a short piece, so I have some room to
        spread out. And I'd like your input (privately or publicly).

        The key question: *What should people know about
        manager-and-worker one-on-one meetings? *

        What do you wish your manager or employees had understood?
        What did you appreciate when they did?

        Among the topics I’m going to cover: why one-on-ones are
        important; what dire things happen when you don't do them, or
        don't honor that process; how the one-on-one is different
        based on your roles (manager/peon, client/consultant,
        mentor/mentee); logistics and timing; what you should expect
        to talk about... and NOT to talk about; real life examples
        (and lessons to take away from them); judging success.

        I’d love to hear from you about your advice and experience
        with one-on-ones – both the good ones and (even more
        valuably) when things did not work ideally. Tell me your
        stories. Anecdotes are awesome. If they happen to fit in any
        of the categories above, that’s groovy; if not, that’s cool too.

        You don’t need to be an “authority” on HR or doing
        one-on-ones. I want real-world experiences!

        It's completely okay to be anonymous; the point here is to
        share advice. Though if you would like to be quoted, that's
        do-able. (Context does help; if you've managed developers for
        12 years readers will get a different perception than for
        someone on her first job.)

        --Esther
        twitter.com/estherschindler <http://twitter.com/estherschindler>

        _______________________________________________
        Discuss mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
        This list provided by the League of Professional System
        Administrators
        http://lopsa.org/

    _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing
    list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This
    list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
    http://lopsa.org/


    _______________________________________________
    Discuss mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
    This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
    http://lopsa.org/


_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to