> From: discuss-boun...@lists.lopsa.org [mailto:discuss- > boun...@lists.lopsa.org] On Behalf Of Derek Balling > > If someone suggests 8x8, smack them hard across the face.
ehhehehhe, I work at a company right now that uses 8x8. I have considered moving off them before, and I'm sure there are better alternatives out there, but ultimately decided it wasn't worth the effort. Not that much to gain. When I saw Matthew's OP here a few minutes ago, I momentarily considered responding, but couldn't make up my mind if I would have positive versus negative feedback, and decided not to post, until I saw this. Overall, I think I would have a *slightly* negative review, but the above position is too extreme to be fair, so I have to come to the defense of 8x8 and say, they're not that bad. They have a moderate feature set, at moderate pricing, and moderately good support and sales. Nothing special, nothing horrible. Yes usable. No complaints from either my users or finance dept. If I make a change it's because I'm trying to make an improvement, in terms of feature set or price, and there just simply isn't enough at stake to motivate me over the risk . Anything I could gain will not be amazingly impressive, but if I screw up and choose a new provider that *does* elicit complaints from users, the fault will be entirely mine. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.lopsa.org https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
