> On 7/24/24 08:21, ma...@mohawksoft.com wrote: >> Thoughts: >> (1) loading pcode into a kernel driver. Are you kidding me? > > What is pcode? Pascal?
I'm not sure which flavor of "pcode" which is a portable code, like java byte-code. > > >> (2) loading pcode (in any environment) without basic sanity checks >> (checksum, structural verification, etc.) is total incompetence. This is >> a >> disaster waiting to happen, even a little bit-rot could create a problem >> that would be difficult to diagnose and fix. > > Almost as if no one sat down, thought it through, and did a careful > design. Heck, who needs to think and design anything these days now that > we have "design patterns" and "best practices"? If the well formatted > little code changes that reviewers recognize ("design patterns") and > don't need to think about get approved, that's "best practices"! I know, it's insane. > > >> (3) Unstaged rollout: amateur hour nonsense. > > That is something they were explicitly selling as a feature (speed!), > not a bug. Right? > Seriously. > > -kb > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@driftwood.blu.org > https://driftwood.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@driftwood.blu.org https://driftwood.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss