Hi NoOp, *, Am 30.11.2011 04:50 schrieb NoOp: > On 11/28/2011 08:23 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
[..] >> * make it easy for new and peripherally involved users to get >> replies to their casual E-mails without doing a long list of >> operations. >> Where by a long list of operations, I mean, that in order to get a >> reply to your mail/question, first you need to: [.. trimmed the referenced paragraph ..] > You've obviously never spent time on the OOo user & discuss lists... [.. bad experience with above use case ..] > I subscribe to over 80 lists (via gmane.org) Using a nntp-client You are not affected by the change.. > and respond regularly to 10-15 daily. Were I required to adjust my > standard 'Reply' to specifically reply to the list rather than the > individual poster I'd have to make major modifications to my client > (SeaMonkey). Would You consider to do that change if You knew making life easier for *many* community co-members by doing so? Anyways - You don't have to ;o)) > I view and respond to a list, not to individual posters. There are so many pro and cons regarding that, how about having it most easy *for both sides* to follow their believing? > Further, the changes that you are requesting (if I understand them > correctly) You probably don't.. The change in question only concerns reverting the setting of the "reply-to: $list" header added by the mailinglist software to each message sent. > would mean that I'd then have an additional, direct email in > my inbox from each list poster when I've specifically chosen to view & > respond via an nntp source (gmane.org) rather than list email. No. This can happen if accidently a poster uses "reply to all" instead of "reply-to-list", without trimming the posters address. > Your request now places the burden on each list user to make changes > in order to avoid responding to the list poster and instead reply to > the list in general. No. Only those using "reply" instead of "reply-to-list" have to change their habits (which admittedly might cause some annoyance during the changing period). [.. general mailinglist access proposal ..] > If you wish to reply to each poster individually, then perhaps you can > modify Evolution 3.0.2 to conform to Reply and 'Reply All' to suit your > requirements. Thats the reason the change will be done: Make Your mail software work how it's intended to work, regardless which one. > -1 Wrong assumption? Gruß/regards Friedrich -- Friedrich Strohmaier - Admin team - The Document Foundation http://www.documentfoundation.org/ -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
