Sorry,, I meant to send the previous email to the list. On Thursday, 4 May 2023 13:01:10 EEST Marcus Müller wrote:
> Because you intuitively would start with a single symbol and multiply it > with the *whole* sequence. What George's code does is different: It takes > each sample of the audio signal and multiplies it with a corresponding > random sample. > I understand now. I wouldn't use a random number generator for this. Still, pretty interesting. Tough I can foresee objections from narrow-band users of QO100 :) Cheers, Adrian
