Greetings all!

Special thanks to Jean-Michel Friedt for submitting the first Block Party
article for QEX Magazine.

If you are thinking about submitting an article for this series, then
please get in touch and I will do all I can to make the job easier.

-Michelle W5NYV




On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 4:27 PM Michelle Thompson <
mountain.miche...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Call for Submissions: GNU Radio "Block Party" Articles for ARRL QEX
> Magazine
>
> You are invited to contribute an article for ARRL QEX Magazine. The QEX
> editor Kai Siwiak (https://www.linkedin.com/in/kai-siwiak-002123/) at
> ARRL's QEX Magazine (http://www.arrl.org/qex) is open to and interested
> in publishing a number of articles about GNU Radio Blocks!
>
> This may become a regular series of articles. Authors receive financial
> compensation for accepted contributions and make a direct and enduring
> contribution to increased technical expertise in the amateur radio
> community with their published work.
>
> What do you need to do?
> 1) pick a block!
> 2) use the template!
> 3) write your amazing 1000-1500 word article!
> 4) submit your article! If you want it to be considered for this special
> category of writing, please send it to me at w5...@arrl.net
> 5) enjoy being able to teach the amateur radio world more about GNU Radio,
> one block at a time.
>
> Here is the GNU Radio Block Party article template.
>
> A. Introduction
>
> GNU Radio is a free and open-source software development toolkit. It
> provides signal processing blocks that implement software radios. GNU Radio
> can be used with readily-available low-cost external RF hardware to create
> software-defined radios, or without hardware in a simulation-like
> environment. GNU Radio is widely used in amateur radio.
>
> GNU Radio is used in a format called flowgraphs. These graphs are composed
> of functional blocks. Each of these blocks performs a specific task. Each
> block is connected to other blocks by inputs and/or outputs. Connections
> between blocks are represented on the screen as directional arrows.
>
> Flowgraphs look very much like traditional system block diagrams.
> Flowgraphs can serve as a description or documentation of a radio
> architecture. Unlike a block diagram on a sheet of paper, GNU Radio
> flowgraphs operate directly on live signals, can do almost any digital
> signal processing, and produce a huge variety of useful signals.
>
> B. Introduce and Describe Your Block
>
> <Your content here!>
>
> Introduce a block of interest to radio amateurs.
> Describe the block's function in detail.
> Describe an application where this block would be used.
> Include any necessary theory for understanding this block.
> Provide or reference an example flowgraph.
>
> C. Writing Prompts
>
> Use some, all, or none of the following Writing Prompts. These are
> suggestions to spark your creativity and are not coverage requirements.
>
> What does this block "really" do?
> Is the function "under the hood" not exactly the same as what people
> assume it to be?
> Is this block designed for a particular type of communication or for a
> particular community?
> What would the equivalent hardware circuit look like?
> Does the block have no achievable equivalent in hardware?
> What is the advantage to using a software component instead of the
> equivalent hardware?
> Who are the primary contributors? Why did they write this block? If they
> had to do it over, what would they do differently?
> Are there any open issues with this block? If someone wanted to help with
> this block, how would they contribute?
> How do digital samples get into and/or out of this block?
> Does this block require other blocks to work properly?
> What is configurable in the block?
> What things can't be changed in this block?
> Are there any quirks?
> Are there any "war stories" in this block's history?
> Have there been any major bugs with this block?
> Is there a way this block can be mis-used or create unexpected results?
> Is the block computationally efficient, or not? Why?
> Does the block use any notable or unusual programming or mathmatic
> techniques?
>
>
> D. Questions? Comments? Critique? Please let me know at:
>
> w5...@arrl.net
>
> -Michelle W5NYV
>

Reply via email to