Hi Nicolas and Martin,

Thank you again for answering all my queries.
I will definitely make the changes suggested in the timeline.
By "both the tools", I meant that there would be an option to use any one
of the following parsers.

Thanks!

Regards,
Arpit Gupta


On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:53 PM Martin Braun <martin.br...@ettus.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 03:36:21PM +0530, Arpit Gupta wrote:
> >    Happy Holi everyone (holi is an Indian festival of colors)
> >
> >    Thank you Nicolas for your valuable response
> >
> >    I understood all your points and will surely make changes in the
> proposal.
> >
> >    The tools here I referred are both pygccxml and libclang.
> >
> >    There is trade off for both the tools:-
> >
> >    1). Pygccxml takes up a quite a bit of computation time while
> libclang is
> >    better in this case.
> >
> >    2). Pygccxml is quite mature and also has a proper documentation which
> >    gives it advantage over libclang.
> >
> >    3). Pygccxml generates a nice AST which is really understandable and
> easy
> >    to work with while this is not the case in libclang.
> >
> >    4). Still libclang is really popular C++ parsing tool and is under
> >    continuous development which gives us an excellent opportunity to
> explore
> >    it.
> >
> >    So, I think itâ**s worth it to use both of them to parse header files.
> >
> >    I definitely know that the most important part of the project is about
> >    extracting most of the information from the header files, but I
> thought
> >    that the ultimate goal is to create YAML files for the GRC. I will
> >    definitely make these changes and Iâ**m really sorry for the confusion
> >    created due to this in the proposal.
> >
> >    So, Should I proceed using both the tools?
>
> Do you mean, use both tools at the same time, or have an option to use
> either tool?
>
> -- M
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to