On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 03:36:21PM +0530, Arpit Gupta wrote: > Happy Holi everyone (holi is an Indian festival of colors) > > Thank you Nicolas for your valuable response > > I understood all your points and will surely make changes in the proposal. > > The tools here I referred are both pygccxml and libclang. > > There is trade off for both the tools:- > > 1). Pygccxml takes up a quite a bit of computation time while libclang is > better in this case. > > 2). Pygccxml is quite mature and also has a proper documentation which > gives it advantage over libclang. > > 3). Pygccxml generates a nice AST which is really understandable and easy > to work with while this is not the case in libclang. > > 4). Still libclang is really popular C++ parsing tool and is under > continuous development which gives us an excellent opportunity to explore > it. > > So, I think itâ**s worth it to use both of them to parse header files. > > I definitely know that the most important part of the project is about > extracting most of the information from the header files, but I thought > that the ultimate goal is to create YAML files for the GRC. I will > definitely make these changes and Iâ**m really sorry for the confusion > created due to this in the proposal. > > So, Should I proceed using both the tools?
Do you mean, use both tools at the same time, or have an option to use either tool? -- M
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
