Ali,
Is that really your forecast? That won't work. You'll need to implement it.
Unless you actually meant to do consume_each(noutput_items) AND
return(noutput_items), because then you shouldn't be using a general
gr::block, but gr::sync_block, which saves you the hassle of
implementing a forecast and of explicitly consuming items.
Best regards,
Marcus
On 07/21/2017 08:20 AM, Ali wrote:
> #ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
> #include "config.h"
> #endif
>
> #include <gnuradio/io_signature.h>
> #include "block_name_impl.h"
> #include "function.h"
>
> namespace gr {
> namespace module {
>
> block_name::sptr
> block_name::make(float parameter)
> {
> return gnuradio::get_initial_sptr
> (new block_name_impl(parameter));
> }
>
> /*
> * The private constructor
> */
>
> *int myints[] = {4000,4000,4000,4000,4000,4000,4000,4000};*
> *const std::vector<int> inputs (myints,
> myints+sizeof(myints)/sizeof(float));*
> *int myints2[] = {4000,4000,4,4};*
> *const std::vector<int> outputs (myints2,
> myints2+sizeof(myints2)/sizeof(float));*
>
> block_name_impl::block_name_impl(float parameter)
> : gr::block("block_name",
> *gr::io_signature::makev(8,8,inputs),*
> *gr::io_signature::makev(4,4,outputs)),*
> parameter2(parameter)
> {}
>
> /*
> * Our virtual constructor
> */
> block_name::~block_name_impl()
> {
> }
>
> void
> block_name_impl::forecast(int noutput_items, gr_vector_int
> &ninput_items_required)
> {
> /* <+forecast+> e.g. ninput_items_required[0] = noutput_items */
> }
>
> int
> block_name_impl::general_work (int noutput_items,
> gr_vector_int &ninput_items,
> gr_vector_const_void_star &input_items,
> gr_vector_void_star &output_items)
>
> {
> * const float *in1 = (const float *) input_items[0];*
> * const float *in2 = (const float *) input_items[1];*
> * const float *in3 = (const float *) input_items[2];*
> * const float *in4 = (const float *) input_items[3];*
> * const float *in5 = (const float *) input_items[4];*
> * const float *in6 = (const float *) input_items[5];*
> * const float *in7 = (const float *) input_items[6];*
> * const float *in8 = (const float *) input_items[7];*
> * float *out1 = (float *) output_items[0];*
> * float *out2 = (float *) output_items[1];*
> * float *out3 = (float *) output_items[2];*
> * float *out4 = (float *) output_items[3];*
>
> // Do <+signal processing+>
> // Tell runtime system how many input items we consumed on
> // each input stream.
>
> *function(in1,in2,in3,in4,in5,in6,in7,in8,parameter2,out1,out2,out3,out4);*
>
> consume_each(noutput_items);
> return noutput_items;
> }
> }
> }
>
>
> The "function line" may be inside a for, I am not sure. I am not sure
> of the bold lines also. What is your overall comments?
>
>
>
>
>
> 2017-07-21 8:52 GMT+03:00 Ali <03do...@gmail.com
> <mailto:03do...@gmail.com>>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Patrick's code does not work since I think I am using c++98. I
> dont know how to enable c++11. Anyway for c++98 I wrote the
> followings(I found on the internet):
>
> -->
> int myints[] = {4000,4000,4000,4000,4000,4000,4000,4000};
> const std::vector<int> inputs (myints,
> myints+sizeof(myints)/sizeof(float));
> int myints2[] = {4000,4000,4,4};
> const std::vector<int> outputs (myints2,
> myints2+sizeof(myints2)/sizeof(float));
> -->
> makev(8,8,inputs) and makev(4,4,outputs)
>
> It is compiled after "sudo make" command.
> But when I wrote "gr_modtool makexml function", I got the
> following error(... means I skipped writing these lines).
>
> ...
> Making GRC bindings for lib/function_impl.cc...
> tbi
> Error: Can't parse input signature.
> tbi
> Error: Can't parse output signature.
> ...
> if iosig[inout]['max_ports'] == '-1':
> Key error: 'in'
>
> I will post my whole code later.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2017-07-21 1:14 GMT+03:00 Patrick Sathyanathan <wp...@hotmail.com
> <mailto:wp...@hotmail.com>>:
>
> Try this instead:
>
>
> const std::vector<int>
> inputs{4000,4000,4000,4000,4000,4000,4000,4000};
>
> and make sure you compile with c++11 enabled.
>
> --Patrick
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Discuss-gnuradio
> <discuss-gnuradio-bounces+wpats=hotmail....@gnu.org
> <mailto:hotmail....@gnu.org>> on behalf of Ali
> <03do...@gmail.com <mailto:03do...@gmail.com>>
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 20, 2017 12:13 AM
> *To:* discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <mailto:discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNURadio OOT vector
> input/output with different size
>
> Hi,
>
> I dont have any background about C++. So I could not generate
> the std::vector<int> with the desired content and could not
> fınd anything on the internet.
>
> const std::vector<int> inputs[]
> = {4000,4000,4000,4000,4000,4000,4000,4000};
>
> does not work. I am getting the following error:
>
> "conversion from 'int' to non-scalar type 'std::vector<int>'
> requested"
>
> Best,
> Ali
>
>
>
>
> 2017-07-18 11:51 GMT+03:00 Marcus Müller <muel...@kit.edu
> <mailto:muel...@kit.edu>>:
>
> Hi Ali,
>
>> I think this should also work, shouldn't it?
> no, that's why I explained what you need to do (use makev).
>
>> Does this part need to be changed since I am working with
>> the vectors?
> No, not really. The vectors are still only consecutive
> numbers in memory.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marcus
>
>
> On 18.07.2017 07:51, Ali wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 1- Actually I am using the followings
>>
>> make(8,8,1000*sizeof(float))
>> make3(4,4,1000*sizeof(float),1000*sizeof(float),4*sizeof(float))
>>
>> I think this should also work, shouldn't it?
>>
>> 2- Under the general work function I am using the followings:
>>
>> const float *in1 = (const float *) input_items[0]
>> ...
>> float *out1 = (float *) output_items[0]
>>
>> Does this part need to be changed since I am working with
>> the vectors?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ali
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-07-17 16:42 GMT+03:00 Marcus Müller <muel...@kit.edu
>> <mailto:muel...@kit.edu>>:
>>
>> Hi Ali,
>>
>> So, you want one block with:
>>
>> * 8 inputs, itemsize0…7 = 1000*4B = 4000B
>> * 4 outputs, itemsize0=itemsize1=4000B,
>> itemsize2=itemsize3=16B
>>
>> Correct?
>>
>> You need to generate two std::vector<int> with content
>>
>> {4000,4000,4000,4000,4000,4000,4000,4000}
>>
>> and
>>
>> {4000,4000,16,16}
>>
>> respectively, and use gr::io_signature::makev(int
>> min_streams, int max_streams, vector) to generate the
>> io_signatures[1] that you use in your block's
>> constructor. The question whether your block should
>> be a general, or a sync block, is independent from
>> the item sizes of the in and outputs, but depends on
>> whether there's always a fixed ratio of produced
>> output items to consumed input items, as explained in
>> [2].
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://gnuradio.org/doc/doxygen/classgr_1_1io__signature.html#a99e0f9e8de8e7ce16ed92d9f2655e66c
>>
>> <https://gnuradio.org/doc/doxygen/classgr_1_1io__signature.html#a99e0f9e8de8e7ce16ed92d9f2655e66c>
>> [2]
>>
>> https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/Guided_Tutorial_GNU_Radio_in_C%2B%2B#4.3.2_Specific_block_categories
>>
>> <https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/Guided_Tutorial_GNU_Radio_in_C%2B%2B#4.3.2_Specific_block_categories>
>>
>>
>> On 07/17/2017 03:31 PM, Ali wrote:
>>> Hi to all,
>>>
>>> I want to design my own OOT module with the
>>> following I/O:
>>>
>>> 8 inputs (length of 1000 and each element is type of
>>> float)
>>> 2 outputs (length of 1000 and each element is type
>>> of float)
>>> 2 outputs (length of 4 and each element is type of
>>> float)
>>>
>>> I used general type block but I could not get the
>>> desired outputs. Do you suggest other type of
>>> blocks? Is there any example similar to this work
>>> that I can study on? Can you suggest a module name
>>> or a link?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Ali
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>> <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>> <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>> <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>> <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
